Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Pictures Of Trash Bags My Friends Ex Is Threatening To Post Nude Pictures Of Her Online Illegal?

My friends ex is threatening to post nude pictures of her online illegal? - pictures of trash bags

I need a few facts.
She just called police and said there is nothing that we do it because his property.
Is not it somehow wrong? Apart from the moral?
You must obtain permission before publishing photos on the Internet?
I need facts, please.

Thank you!

18 comments:

wizjp said...

uh ... if under 18 years, she has a cow on a complaint of child pornography.

Otherwise, the police reported facts.

wizjp said...

uh ... if under 18 years, she has a cow on a complaint of child pornography.

Otherwise, the police reported facts.

Uncle Pennybags said...

If the type published for profit, which has a civil suit against him because he used not to give permission to the image for commercial purposes. This would require a permit.

But if revenge is not commercial and does not know the answer. Sorry.

Possum said...

If it is not a minor and he knew that he is not the photos of her (or it was) illegal. If he photos of her and she gave as a gift that is free to do whatever he wants with them.

Splitter... said...

The 99% percent of the time is not a crime threat (unless there is a risk of injury) in question. What should the police? Just because I said to my friend I do not mean to steal it from Wal-Mart, that the police can arrest me for theft. If the positions of the images, then it could be something. I think it is morally wrong to pose nude for a friend / girlfriend.

pp.aande... said...

Morally wrong.

If one of your friends former owner of the photo, he can do is your friend.

But if your friend laughed and ordered a few copies of which may actually have steam against any threat to his former friends.

Actions have consequences said...

No, the police quite rightly. Is it legal for any photo (adults), that the person has lawful possession of the sending public.

Do not take nude photos and give your friend (or you can take). Period.

Mutt said...

She posed for photos, so he agreed to take. They are his property, and they write, even if they do not want to send them. The only problem would be if it was low, in which case it could be in trouble for child pornography.

What can they do? Of course you can not UNPOS for photos. But if it seems quite young, and I know where they are published, please contact the Web site in May and say it was a minor, was admitted as the photo. Is likely to take the images off-site immediately, to cover their ass. His ex is not always in trouble because it can prove very likely the opposite, but the pictures are off-site at least.

Poohcat1 said...

I agree with the police in this case. If you knowingly let him into possession of these photos have, be it by letting him or not to take pictures, then you are not belong.

I hope your old friends is not a mirror image of what is real. Child, criminal and totally immature.

Grandview Investigations said...

Did you know that the photos taken? This was the hidden camera, he was not aware of? So it is not their property and were obtained without his permission, so that would be illegal. But keep in mind, this is a civil matter not criminal. This makes a huge difference. If she knew she was taking, can be regarded as his property and can do more or less at will. People should be aware, is to see the images in progress. Sometimes you take for fun, but then comes the break and the man still has pictures that appear mysteriously on the Internet. In any case, they will receive justice through the civil courts and to prove the damage he has received, due to its advertising network.

bedfordc... said...

If there is at least 18 years old when the photos were taken, there is nothing I can do. If the photo was taken to protect its intellectual property and can do whatever he wants with them.

bedfordc... said...

If there is at least 18 years old when the photos were taken, there is nothing I can do. If the photo was taken to protect its intellectual property and can do whatever he wants with them.

Allen said...

Legally there is nothing I can do if you originally received the pictures with your permission.

Allen said...

Legally there is nothing I can do if you originally received the pictures with your permission.

Couman said...

If he has the pictures and had his license at the time, it is true that they are exposed. So it is not illegal to apply. (If you do not use more complicated).

However, if * * notice threatening to them what I think that as blackmail will.

Even if I had to move his family or something, send clearly malicious, it would be harassment.

Couman said...

If he has the pictures and had his license at the time, it is true that they are exposed. So it is not illegal to apply. (If you do not use more complicated).

However, if * * notice threatening to them what I think that as blackmail will.

Even if I had to move his family or something, send clearly malicious, it would be harassment.

pragmati... said...

The police are wrong, because even if these pictures could be your property, which remains the copyright, especially when she signed the authorization model. If you have then downloaded the images from the Internet, you have infringed their copyright and may sue for damages. Since the police refuse to act, your friend needs a good lawyer and must seek an injunction against harassment, copyright infringement and the right to privacy to help her. And then he must go to court for civil damages. In addition, the attorney may do in the situation, what is the product of the police your work ... Stop harassing his ex him.

By the way, how old were you when these images? If it less than 18 child pornography and the police should be called again and this time he said to the age of the person in the photos. And then, her ex can be arrested for the manufacture and possession of child pornography, which remains a crime.

Your friend needs a good lawyer now.

******
Addendum: The fact that your friend has an ex-pObsession of these images does not mean he can do what you want. You can see it and can show your friends, but can not sell without your permission, and not distributed in any form without permission (permission) will be in the form of a signed contract. People often make the mistake of thinking what they can do whatever they want with pictures and in some cases, they can not do that if it is the image of another person unless that person holds copyright.

Addendum # 2: someone has more nudity is allowed in practice publication without harassment, and it was embarrassing to bring them around and harass them.

pragmati... said...

The police are wrong, because even if these pictures could be your property, which remains the copyright, especially when she signed the authorization model. If you have then downloaded the images from the Internet, you have infringed their copyright and may sue for damages. Since the police refuse to act, your friend needs a good lawyer and must seek an injunction against harassment, copyright infringement and the right to privacy to help her. And then he must go to court for civil damages. In addition, the attorney may do in the situation, what is the product of the police your work ... Stop harassing his ex him.

By the way, how old were you when these images? If it less than 18 child pornography and the police should be called again and this time he said to the age of the person in the photos. And then, her ex can be arrested for the manufacture and possession of child pornography, which remains a crime.

Your friend needs a good lawyer now.

******
Addendum: The fact that your friend has an ex-pObsession of these images does not mean he can do what you want. You can see it and can show your friends, but can not sell without your permission, and not distributed in any form without permission (permission) will be in the form of a signed contract. People often make the mistake of thinking what they can do whatever they want with pictures and in some cases, they can not do that if it is the image of another person unless that person holds copyright.

Addendum # 2: someone has more nudity is allowed in practice publication without harassment, and it was embarrassing to bring them around and harass them.

Post a Comment